http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/panpsychism/#4

I'm not a philosopher or even a particularly good thinker, but it's
a little disappointing that, at least in broad strokes (minus the use of
phrases like ontologically explanatorily), I covered the ground offered by
non-material theories of mind during my freshman year in college.
Namely, free-will arises from quantum indeterminancy, that consciousness
is some heretofore undiscovered particle or force of nature, like
quantum gravity, or that it is some fundamentally different "thing" from matter.

I start out reading these articles with such high hopes and am always
disappointed. Is it really the desire to have "something more" than
arid materialism that drives people to find such things plausible in the
absence of any explanation for how it is to exist or interact in a material
universe? Or am I really broken somehow in the head?